Cultural Competence in Nursing Education in the Era of Globalization and Migration: A Rodgers’ Evolutionary Analysis

Sarita Bhattarai¹*, Shaveta Sharma²

¹PhD. Scholar, Narayan Nursing College, GNSU, Professor, College of Nursing, ESI Hospital, Asansol,

West Bengal – 7, India.

²Vice Principal, Narayan Nursing College (NNC), Gopal Narayan Singh University (GNSU), Bihar,

India – 821305.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: saritabhattarai26@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

Background: Rapid globalization and growing patterns of migration have altered the demographic profile of healthcare systems across the world, including in India. As nursing students encounter patients from increasingly diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, the demand for cultural competence becomes more pressing. Although its importance is widely acknowledged, efforts to build cultural competence in nursing education are often fragmented, and the ways in which globalization and migration shape this competence remain insufficiently understood. Aim: This study uses Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis to explore how cultural competence is defined and applied in nursing education today, particularly within the shifting global and migratory landscape. The analysis seeks to identify the defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and related concepts that contribute to a more coherent understanding of cultural competence and to draw out implications for teaching, curricular planning, and institutional policy. Methods: A systematic review of literature indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science was conducted, focusing on English-language publications from 2005 to 2025. Extracted data included definitions, conceptual attributes, antecedents, consequences, and surrogate or related terms. During the analysis and synthesis stage, the findings were organized using Rodgers’ framework. A conceptual framework was also developed to show how these components interact and how the concept continues to evolve within contemporary educational and clinical settings. Findings: The analysis shows that cultural competence in nursing education is not a fixed set of skill but a dynamic process shaped by global mobility, sociocultural diversity, and shifting healthcare expectations. Core attributes identified include cultural awareness, cultural knowledge, cultural sensitivity, communication abilities across cultural and linguistic boundaries, cultural responsiveness, and a commitment to continual learning. Antecedents were linked to demographic diversity, internationalization within nursing programs, recognition of structural health inequities, and institutional readiness to support cultural learning. Consequences ranged from better patient–provider relationships and reduced disparities to increased global readiness among graduates and broader institutional shifts. Concepts such as cultural humility, cultural safety, and transcultural nursing offered useful comparative and contrasting perspectives. Implications: The findings point to the need for curriculum integration, stronger faculty preparation, richer experiential learning opportunities, policy reinforcement, and refined forms of assessment that capture cultural competence as an ongoing developmental process. Conclusion: Through the lens of Rodgers’ evolutionary approach, this study offers a more grounded and context-sensitive understanding of cultural competence in nursing education. The conceptual clarity gained here provides direction for educational reforms and supports the preparation of nursing students to deliver culturally responsive, equitable care in an increasingly interconnected world.

KEYWORDS: Cultural competence, Globalization, Migration, Nursing education, Conceptual analysis, Rodgers’ evolutionary method.

INTRODUCTION:

Globalization and migration have become defining features of the 21st century, influencing not only economies and social structures but also the way healthcare systems function across the world.^1,2 People now move across borders for a wide range of reasons work, education, family, conflict, and displacement and these movements have created increasingly multicultural and mobile societies.^3,4 Healthcare settings, and nursing in particular, are feeling the impact of these demographic changes. Nurses are encountering patients whose cultural, linguistic, and social backgrounds differ from their own far more often than in the past.⁵ At the same time, the global movement of nurses and nurse educators has expanded, making nursing a profession that is now deeply intertwined with international mobility and global health system.⁶

Within nursing education, these changes highlight the need to strengthen the way cultural competence is taught and understood. Cultural competence can no longer be viewed as an optional or secondary skill rather, it has become central to the delivery of safe, equitable, and person-centred care.^7,8 Nursing students today are exposed to a wide spectrum of cultural beliefs, health practices, and perspectives during their training. Yet, educational programs may not always keep pace with the complexity brought about by globalization and migration complexity that involves much more than cultural differences alone. Students must also navigate issues related to shifting identities, acculturation, and transnational experiences that influence health behaviours and expectations.^9,10

Research has shown that when nurses demonstrate strong cultural competence, patients experience numerous benefits like, they tend to trust their providers more, feel more satisfied with their care, and often adhere more closely to treatment plans¹. Although the importance of cultural competence is widely acknowledged, a noticeable gap persists in the literature. Few studies have explored how nursing students actually develop this competence at different stages of their education and clinical training.^11,12

Despite growing interest in the topic, cultural competence is still not clearly conceptualized within the broader realities of globalization and migration. Many nursing curricula continue to rely on static or checklist-based models of culture, rather than recognizing culture as fluid, dynamic, and evolving, shaped by global connectedness and ongoing migratory processes. Without conceptual clarity, educational strategies risk becoming superficial, unintentionally reinforcing stereotypes, or failing to prepare students for the nuanced situations they will encounter in practice.¹³

For these reasons, this paper applies Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis to examine how globalization and migration influence the meaning, attributes, antecedents, and consequences of cultural competence in nursing education. By bringing greater clarity to the concept, the analysis aims to support more effective curriculum design, teaching approaches, and policy development that can better equip nursing students for the increasingly diverse and globally interconnected healthcare environments in which they will practice.

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK:

Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis is grounded in the understanding that development of concepts is continuous and does not remain fixed.¹ A concept represents an abstraction that changes over time as it is interpreted and applied across different disciplines, contexts, and historical settings.^1,2 Guided by this perspective, the present analysis acknowledges that cultural competence in nursing education is similarly shaped by broader social forces, particularly globalization and patterns of migration.³

Rodgers’ methodology involves examining several key components:^1,5

1. The context and circumstances in which the concept is used;

2. Surrogate or closely related terms

3. Defining attributes that characterize the concept

4. Antecedents or conditions that give rise to the concept

5. Consequences that follow from the concept

6. Related concepts and

7. Implications for future research, practice, and theoretical development.

Viewed through this evolutionary framework, cultural competence is understood not as a static endpoint but as a continually developing process influenced by the movement of people, cultural exchange, and shifting institutional expectations.¹ In this manuscript, globalization and migration are positioned as central contextual forces that shape how cultural competence is conceptualized, taught, and enacted within contemporary nursing education.

METHODS:

Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis was carried out in several phases:

I. Identification of the Concept and Context:

The concept of cultural competence in nursing education is examined within the broader contemporary environment shaped by globalization and increasing population mobility.⁴ In this review, consideration is given to the ways in which global movement such as student migration, transnational nursing labor, and cross-border clinical practice has influenced how cultural competence is defined, applied, and interpreted within educational settings.

Literature Review:

A literature search was conducted using major academic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science. Search terms included “cultural competence,” “nursing education,” “globalization,” “migration,” “transcultural nursing,” and related keyword combinations.

Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in English in peer-reviewed journals between 2005 and 2025 and addressed cultural competence in nursing education, global nursing issues, or concept analysis. Conceptual papers, theoretical discussions, empirical research, review articles, and position papers were also incorporated.

Data Extraction:

From the selected literature, information pertaining to definitions, key attributes, antecedents, consequences, and related or surrogate terms associated with cultural competence was extracted. In addition, the ways in which globalization or migration was connected to discussions of cultural competence were also documented.

Analysis and Synthesis:

· The extracted data were systematically organized in accordance with Rodgers’ evolutionary framework, focusing on attributes, antecedents, consequences, and related concepts.

· Using these elements, a conceptual framework was developed to illustrate the dynamic interactions among the components and to demonstrate how the concept of cultural competence evolves and functions within real-world educational and sociocultural contexts.

Implications Development:

Drawing from the analysis, implications were generated for nursing education, including recommendations for curriculum design, pedagogical strategies, policy considerations, and scope for future research.

Conceptual Analysis:

The term Globalization describes the growing interdependence and connectedness of countries along with their economies, cultures, technologies, and social systems becoming tightly linked. One of the major impacts of globalization is migration, which involves people moving across borders for short periods, long-term stays, or repeated cycles of travel. Both globalization and migration shape health systems in meaningful ways, including how nursing is taught and practiced.⁴

Within the nursing education, globalization emerge many forms:

· Students traveling abroad to study nursing,

· International exchange programs and clinical placements,

· Faculty and educators coming from diverse countries,

· The integration of global health concepts into curricula,

· Increasingly diverse patient populations who bring different cultural backgrounds into health systems, and

· Global recruitment of nurses.

II. Surrogate and Related Terms:

During the literature review, several terms were identified that were used as synonyms or related to cultural competence in nursing education:¹

· Cultural skills, cultural awareness, cultural knowledge, cultural sensitivity that were commonly used in nursing models.

· Cultural safety, particularly in community or indigenous healthcare contexts.

· Transcultural nursing, the discipline which provides the theoretical foundation for many cultural competence discussions. 

· Cultural humility, emphasizing lifelong learning and critical self-reflection (though less frequently named in the literature that was reviewed) emerges in global health discourses.

These surrogate terms overlap significantly in nursing education literature, but each brings nuance: cultural safety emphasizes power, respect, and patient-defined safe care; cultural humility stresses an ongoing, lifelong learner posture.

III. Attributes (Core Characteristics):

From the literature, especially concept analyses and empirical nursing education studies, the following key attributes of cultural competence in the context of globalization and migration emerged:^1,6

1. Cultural Awareness: It involves honest self-reflection about one’s cultural background, biases, and assumptions. It also recognizes that culture is not fixed; identities evolve, blend, and shift through global mobility and transnational experiences.

2. Cultural Knowledge: Refers to understanding various cultural beliefs, practices, and health traditions. It includes awareness of global migration trends, the health concerns of diaspora communities, and the socio-political forces that shape migrant health.

3. Cultural Sensitivity/Understanding: establishes respect for diverse perspectives and empathy for the lived realities of population with hybrid cultural identities.

4. Cultural Skills: It refers to the ability to communicate effectively across languages, using interpreters when needed and to integrate patients’ cultural beliefs into care planning, tailoring interventions to culturally meaningful frameworks. 

5. Cultural Responsiveness: It focuses on adapting care practices to meet the needs of culturally diverse populations in equitable and respectful ways. Extends to institutions offering nursing programs to incorporate policies, and curricula to reflect the realities of global diversity.

6. Dynamic and Continuous Learning: It recognizes that cultural competence is not a fixed achievement; it develops over time as global patterns and cultural identities that continue to change. It Requires an ongoing commitment to reflection, humility, and lifelong learning.

IV. Antecedents:

Antecedents refer to the conditions that must exist before cultural competence can develop. In today’s world shaped by globalization and large-scale migration several key factors contribute to create the foundation for cultural competence in nursing education.¹¹

1. Global Mobility and Migration: Increased migration for work, education, or safety has led to more culturally diverse patient populations and student cohorts. Nurses and educators themselves often move across borders, bringing varied cultural perspectives into classrooms and clinical settings. These transnational experiences naturally shape how nursing education is delivered and understood. Faculty and students frequently move across countries, creating learning environments shaped by transnational experiences.

2. Internationalization of Nursing Education: Nursing programs are becoming more globally focused. Many now include global health topics, international exchanges, and partnerships with institutions in other countries. At the same time, accreditation and regulatory bodies increasingly emphasize cultural competence and global readiness as essential outcomes of nursing education.

3.  Sociopolitical Recognition: There is growing awareness of health inequities, systemic discrimination, and unequal access to care affecting both migrant and non-migrant populations. Policymakers and health authorities recognize that culturally competent healthcare providers are essential for addressing the needs of increasingly diverse and complex societies.

4. Institutional Support: Cultural competence cannot develop without organizational commitment. Support from leadership, ongoing faculty development, and adequate resources are critical for integrating cultural competence into nursing curricula. Educational strategies such as diverse clinical placements, simulations, and community-based learning further expose students to different cultural contexts and lived experience.

V. Consequences (Outcomes):

The development of cultural competence in nursing education leads to several meaningful outcomes that benefit patients, professionals, and institutions.^1,6

1. Enhanced Patient–Provider Relationships: Culturally competent nurses are better able to build trust, communicate effectively, and show respect for patients’ beliefs and values. This reduces misunderstandings and helps prevent misdiagnoses that may arise from cultural miscommunication.

2. Reduction in Health Disparities: Providing culturally responsive care supports more equitable health outcomes, particularly for migrant populations. Patients are more likely to access healthcare services, follow treatment plans, and report higher satisfaction when they feel understood and respected.

3. Global Nursing Readiness: Graduates are better prepared to work in a globalized healthcare workforce, whether locally or internationally. Nursing programs also become more adaptable, with curricula that can respond to changing migration patterns and cultural diversity.

4. Professional Growth and Reflective Practice: Cultural competence encourages nurses to become reflective, flexible, and committed to lifelong learning. Nurse educators likewise develop stronger skills in teaching and mentoring students from diverse cultural backgrounds.

5. Institutional and Policy Transformation: At an organizational level, cultural competence drives curriculum reform, policy development, and structural changes within nursing schools. It also fosters ongoing conversations about equity, social justice, and global citizenship in nursing education.

Fig- Conceptual framework based on Rodgers’ Evolutionary analysis: Cultural Competence in Nursing Education in the Context of Globalization and Migration.

VI. Related Concepts / Contradictory Cases:

· Cultural Safety: As identified in other concept analyses, cultural safety emphasizes power imbalances, patient-defined notions of safe care, and the need to address the structural and institutional inequities rather than focussing solely on individual cultural traits.¹

· Cultural Humility: Focuses on a lifelong process of self-evaluation and self-critique, recognizing that one cannot be “competent” in all cultures and must remain open to learning from patients and communities. ¹

· Cultural Shock/Acculturation Stress: Concepts referring to the psychological challenges faced by migrants themselves as they adapt to new cultural environment, which intersect with nursing care delivery and educational contexts.¹

· Transcultural Sensitivity: Slightly narrower than competence, this term sometimes emphasizes attitudes and awareness rather than integration of knowledge, behaviours and skills required for culturally responsive practice.¹

VII. Implications for Nursing Education:

The accelerating pace of globalization and migration necessitates a transformation in nursing education to prepare graduates for increasingly multicultural and mobile patient populations.⁴ As cultural and linguistic diversity becomes a defining feature of contemporary healthcare environments, nursing programs must shift from viewing cultural competence as an optional or peripheral component to integrating it as a core educational priority. Based on this conceptual analysis, several practical implications emerge for nursing education:

1. Curriculum Design: Curricular reform is essential. Nursing curricula should embed cultural competence throughout foundational, clinical, and advanced courses rather than confining it to isolated electives or brief modules.⁶ Evidence-based frameworks such as cultural humility, transcultural nursing theories, and structural competency should guide content development to ensure that students acquire not only cultural knowledge but also critical self-reflection, empathy, and awareness of power dynamics affecting patient care.¹ Content related to global migration, diaspora health, and transnational social determinants of health should be systematically integrated.

2. Faculty Development: Faculty development is pivotal. Many nurse educators report limited training in cultural competence, which affects their confidence in teaching these concepts. Institutions must invest in professional development that equips faculty with the cultural, pedagogical, and reflective skills required to model and teach culturally responsive care. Faculty diversity and international collaboration further enrich the educational environment and offer students exposure to varied perspectives.

3. Experiential Learning: Simulation-based education, standardized patient scenarios involving cross-cultural encounters, virtual exchange programs, and community-engaged learning with migrant and diverse populations can enhance students’ experiential understanding of cultural complexity.¹¹ These approaches encourage students to practice communication, manage cultural misunderstandings, and develop skills in delivering person-centered care. Strengthening cultural encounters through experiential learning and immersion programs is essential.⁷

4. Policy and Institutional Support: Nursing education must embrace institutional and policy-level support to sustain cultural competence initiatives. This includes establishing clear standards, aligning accreditation requirements with global health priorities, strengthening international partnerships, and ensuring access to resources that support inclusivity and equity. Such structural supports reinforce the message that cultural competence is integral to safe, ethical, and effective nursing practice.

5. Assessment and Research: Assessment and evaluation mechanisms must evolve. Traditional testing methods often fail to capture students’ growth in cultural competence. Nursing programs should adopt multidimensional assessment tools that measure not only knowledge but also adaptability, responsiveness, and reflective growth including reflective portfolios, performance-based evaluation, self-assessment inventories, and longitudinal assessments to monitor students’ progress and identify areas needing reinforcement.¹¹

DISCUSSION:

The conceptual analysis illustrates that cultural competence in the contemporary era cannot be fully understood without situating it within the forces of globalization and migration.⁴ Traditional models rooted in static, group-based representations of culture are insufficient for preparing nursing students for the fluid and transnational realities they will face in clinical settings. The attributes identified, especially the emphasis on dynamic learning and institutional responsiveness reflect a shift from a competence-as-endpoint paradigm to competence-as-process.¹ This aligns with Rodgers’ view of concepts as evolving entities. The conceptual framework illustrates how cultural competence in nursing education develops, what it consists of, and the positive outcome it produces. It shows a logical flow from the factors that create the need for cultural competence, to the core attributes the students must gain and eventually to the benefits for the students, institutions and the healthcare system. Moreover, the antecedents highlight that cultural competence is not solely an individual attribute but deeply connected with institutional and systemic factors. Without policy-level commitment, global partnerships, and curricular support, efforts to build cultural competence may remain superficial. Importantly, the consequences point to broad benefits. For students, there is professional growth and readiness to work in disparate contexts; for patients, better care and trust; and for institutions, transformative changes at curricular and policy levels. However, there are challenges. Globalization and migration also bring power imbalances: nurse educators from low- and middle-income countries may feel marginalized in global partnerships, and curricula may privilege Western perspectives. There is also a risk that cultural competence training becomes performative or checklist-driven if not grounded in structural awareness and reflective practice.⁶

LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH:

While Rodgers’ method accounts for context and change, the present analysis is based primarily on literature and does not include fieldwork that may limit the ability of this analysis to reflect the nuanced realities, challenges, and insights that arise in diverse educational and clinical settings. Including perspectives like interviews with students, educators, or migrants would enrich and deepen the conceptual clarity achieved here. Additionally, this conceptual analysis is limited by reliance on published literature in English and may underrepresent non-English perspectives on cultural competence in non-Western contexts.

Future Research should include empirical studies, qualitative and quantitative, to explore how nursing students understand and embody cultural competence in real-world, cross-border contexts. Further, comparative studies across states and countries would be valuable to understand how globalization and migration differently shape cultural competence in diverse educational systems.

CONCLUSION:

Globalization and migration fundamentally reshape the context in which nursing education operates. This conceptual analysis, using Rodgers’ evolutionary method, clarifies how these forces influence cultural competence by revealing its dynamic attributes, critical antecedents, and far-reaching consequences. Cultural competence in this era is not a static destination but a continuous process of learning, adaptation, and responsiveness. For nursing educators and institutions, integrating this enriched conceptualization into curricula, faculty development, and policy is essential. Doing so will better prepare nurses to deliver culturally congruent, equitable, and high-quality care in an increasingly interconnected world. As the nursing profession continues to globalize, embracing this evolving concept is not optional but it is imperative.

REFERENCES:

1. Rodgers BL. Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. Journal of Advanced Nursing [Internet]. 1989 Apr;14(4):330–5. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb03420.x/full

2. Madureira VSF, Silva DMGV, Trentini M, Souza SS. Concept analysis methods in nursing: a theoretical reflection. Esc Anna Nery. 2021; 25(2)

3. Nuuyoma V, Muvumwaeni S, Chihururu L. Transcultural nursing: a qualitative analysis of nursing students’ experiences in a multicultural context in North-Eastern Namibia. BMC Nursing. 2024 Feb 15; 23(1).

4. El-Messoudi Y, Crespo ML, Leyva‐Moral JM. Exploring the education in cultural competence and transcultural care in Spanish for nurses and future nurses: a scoping review and gap analysis. BMC Nursing. 2023 Sep 16; 22(1).

5. Sharifi N, Adib-Hajbaghery M, Najafi M. Cultural competence in nursing: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2019;99(1):1–8.

6. Dudas KI. Cultural Competence: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2012 Sep; 33(5): 317–21.

7. Aly E, Alnajjar H, Eman Zain Bajamal, Rahman A, Ranin Ahmed Bahawi. Cultural Competence and Transcultural Teaching Behaviors and Influencing Factors in Nursing Academia: A Mixed-Methods Study Among Nurse Educators. SAGE Open Nursing. 2025 Jan 1; 11.

8. Tang C, Tian B, Zhang X, Zhang K, Xiao X, Simoni JM, et al. The influence of cultural competence of nurses on patient satisfaction and the mediating effect of patient trust. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2019 Nov 8; 75(4): 749–59.

9. Bozorgzad P, Negarandeh R, Raiesifar A, Poortaghi S. Cultural safety: An evolutionary concept analysis. Holistic Nursing Practice. 2016; 30(1): 33–8.

10. Prosen M. Introducing Transcultural Nursing Education: Implementation of Transcultural Nursing in the Postgraduate Nursing Curriculum. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences [Internet]. 2015 Feb; 174: 149–55. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815006916

11. Osmancevic S, Steiner LM, Großschädl F, Lohrmann C, Schoberer D. The effectiveness of cultural competence interventions in nursing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies [Internet]. 2025 Apr 2; 167(2). Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748925000884

12. Oikarainen A, Mikkonen K, Kenny A, Tomietto M, Tuomikoski AM, Meriläinen M, et al. educational interventions designed to develop nurses’ cultural competence: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies [Internet]. 2019 Oct; 98(1): 75–86. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748919301567

13. Liu W, Stone TE, McMaster R. Increasing undergraduate nursing students’ cultural competence: an evaluation study. Global Health Research and Policy. 2018 Mar 5; 3(1).

Received on 17.12.2025         Revised on 29.01.2026

Accepted on 27.02.2026      Published on 30.07.2026

Available online from August 05, 2026

Int. J. Nursing Education and Research. 2026;14(3):220-226.

DOI: 10.52711/2454-2660.2026.00044

©A and V Publications All right reserved

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.